View Single Post
Old 03-03-2007, 05:28 AM   #4 (permalink)
jephree
 
jephree's Avatar
 
Status: ¨*·.¸ «.·°·..·°·.» ¸.·*¨
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 22,297
 jephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L teamjephree is a key member in the D-A-L team



jephree is online now  
Re: Your experiences of Vista performance

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJNafey View Post
The first was an Acer laptop with Vista Home Premium pre-installed. It was a Core 2 Duo 1.66GHz with 1GB RAM and I was very disappointed.
Someone made a bad choice here (Acer in my opinion). That processor is slow at 1.66GHz per core. Even the quads ship at 2.66GHz or 2.68GHz which is still slower than many P4 single cores.

In a standard PC you can overclock these CPU's up to 3.4GHZ to 3.7GHz easily but I don't know about a laptop.

The idea was to spread the CPU usage over multiple cores but these cores run slower than a standard single core. Unless the software is geared to split itself on the cores your programs are going to run at 1.66GHz which is a very slow processor in today's terms.

I am just experimenting with my first quad core and it is quite tricky to set them up even when you can overclock.

Of course just my salty opinion.

Last edited by jephree; 03-03-2007 at 05:37 AM.


Reply With Quote